The two ways of hegemony and liberty in the virtual world With an emphasis on the views of Isaiah Berlin and Antonio Gramsci

Document Type : .

Authors

1 Department of Management, Faculty of Humanities, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Political Science, Faculty of Humanities, Payame Noor University, Abadan, Iran.

3 Department of Political Science, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Khorramabad, Iran.

4 researcher

10.30465/cps.2022.37667.2851

Abstract

The virtual world is a reality that overshadows the realities of real life. Two important areas of virtual reality are society and politics, which are closely related. To understand the relationship between the two, attention has been paid to the question of which of the two makes the most of this new habitat. That is, Antonio Gramsci and Isaiah Berlin examine the two concepts of hegemony and freedom. The purpose of this article is to answer the fundamental question of whether the virtual ecosystem has led to more human freedom or not. In analyzing this question, this paper shows that governments and governments, through a new model of government that is closely related to the virtual world and the information society, called hegemony, have created a kind of dependence of satisfaction in citizens, which is the dependence of dependence. It has created an illusion of freedom in their minds.

This study shows that governments, through hegemony through the virtual ecosystem, control society, and this is where citizens are confused as to whether they are truly free or in the grip of power; However, it seems that getting out of these two paths of hegemony and freedom in the virtual world is becoming impossible day by day and this hegemonic domination should be controlled only by creating networks of consciousness.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1.  

    Anderson, Perry.(2017). The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci, London: Verso.

    Baccarella C, Wagner T, Kietzmann J, McCarthy.(2018). Social media? It's serious! Understanding the dark side of social media, European Management Journal.

    Bates, Thomas R. (1975). Gramsci and the Theory of Hegemony, Journal of the History of Ideas 36 (2).

    Baudrillard, Jean .(1993). Symbolic Exchange and Death, Trans, Iain H. Grant, London.

    Baylis, John & Smith, Steve(2001). The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, Oxford University Press.

    Berlin,Isaiah .(2002).Liberty- Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty, Edited by Henry Hardy- With an essay on Berlin and his critics- by Ian Harris, oxtord university press.

    Berlin,Isaiah .(2013). The crooked timber of humanity- chapters in the history of ideas, Edited by henry- foreword by john banville, Princeton university press.

    Bokina, John. (1983). Review of Gramsci’s Political Thought: Hegemony, Consciousness and the Revolutionary Process, by Joseph V. Femia, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 77, No 2 (Jun).

    Chenoweth, Erica.(2016) How Social Media Helps Dictators,  https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/11/16/how-social-media-helps-dictators/

    D'Annibale ,Scatamburlo & Boin ,Paul (2006). New Media, Mediascapes.. Toronto: Nelson.

    Eagleton,Terry(1991 ). Ideology: An Introduction London: Verso.

    Edkins, Jenny& Vaughan-Williams ,Nick(2009). Critical Theorists and International Relations. London and New York: Routledge.

    Fischer, Michael M.J. (2006). Culture and Cultural Analysishttps://doi.org/10.1177%2F026327640602300265

    Fischer, Markus. (2006), “Culture and Foreign Politics”, in Brenda Shaffer (Ed.), The Limits of Culture: Islam and Foreign Policy, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Fleras,Augie.(2003). Mass Media Communication in Canada, Toronto: Thomson Nelson

    Hobden, Stephen and Wyn Jones, Richard. (2001). Marxist Theories of International, https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198739852.003.0008.

    Howard, Philip N & Agarwal ,Sheetal .D& Muzammil M. Hussain.(2011). The Dictators’ Digital Dilemma: When Do States Disconnect Their Digital Networks?, https://www.brookings.edu/series/issues-in-technology-innovation.

    Keremoğlu1, Eda & Weidmann1, Nils B.(2020). How Dictators Control The Internet: a review essay, comparative political studies, Vol. 53(10-11)

    Landy, Marcia. (1986). Culture and Politics in the Work of Antonio Gramsci, London• New York.

    McLuhan, Marshall & Bruce R. Powers.(1989). The Global Village. New York: Oxford.

    McLuhan, Marshall & H. Lapham ,Lewis.(1994). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: Oxford

    McLuhan, Marshall.(1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy. Toronto: University of Toront.

    McLuhan,Marshall.(2006). Cybernetics and Human Culture. Introduction to Communication  Dubuque:Kendall/Hunt.

    McQuail, Denis.(1983). mass communication theory, London: Routledge.

    Oberdiek, Hans (1990). Technology: Autonomous or Nneutral, International Studies in The Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698599008573346

    Rupert ,Mark(2009). Antonio Gramsci in Critical Theorists and International Relations, eds Jenny Edkins and Nick Vaughan-Williams ,Oxford: Routledge.

    Shaffer, Brenda.(1989). The Limits of Culture: Islam and Foreign Policy, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Slack, C (2016). Wired yet Disconnected: The Govermence of International CyberRelation. Global Policy, 7(1), pp 69_76.

    Strinati, Dominic. (2005). An Introduction to Theories of Popular Culture, London: Routledge.

    Strinati, Dominic.(2004). An Introduction to Theories of Popular Culture, London: Routledge.

    1. Baccarella ,Christiana& F. Wagner ,Timm& H. Kietzmann, Jan& P. McCarthy, Ian.(2018). Social media? It's serious! Understanding the dark side of social media, European Management Journal.
    2. Femia, Joseph.(2006). Consciousness and the Revolutionary Process, by The American Political Science Review, ed. Toronto: Nelson,2006. 235-49

    Van Dijk, Jan.(2006). The Network Society,London and new york: Routledge.

    Webster ,Frank.(2014). Theories of the Information Society, London: Routledge