Contemporary Political Studies

Contemporary Political Studies

Indicators of Islamism and Republicanism in the Selection of Ayatollah Khamenei as the Leader of the Islamic Republic

Document Type : .

Author
Seyed Yasser Jebraily
Assisstant Professor of Islamic Civilization Studies, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies Tehran, Iran
10.30465/cps.2024.50264.3459
Abstract
Abstract
About nine months before his passing, Imam Khomeini (pbuh) proposed Ayatollah Khamenei as the future leader of the Islamic Revolution, and subsequently, during various periods, he explained the necessary characteristics for leadership of an Islamic society. Considering that the system of religious democracy is a unique and unprecedented model of governance, and one of the reasons for this distinction is the existence of the leadership position, it is necessary to examine whether the system's performance in the selection of the leader has been in line with the indicators of religious democracy (Islamism and republicanism). Therefore, the main question of this research is: What indicators led to the selection of Ayatollah Khamenei as the leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran? Given the topic and research question, it seems that a qualitative method with an analytical-descriptive approach is an appropriate method to achieve the research results. The reason for choosing this method is that it allows for the description of events related to the selection of the leader, while examining the realization of indicators related to the processes of republicanism and elements of Islamism in the thought of religious democracy, with the processes that have taken place for the selection of the leader and the characteristics of the selected individual. The results shows that the specific indicators of religious democracy (republicanism and Islamism) based on legitimacy in Shia political thought, the system of Imamate, and popular presence and acceptance, which are reflected in the constitution, govern the process of the selection of Ayatollah Khamenei.
Keywords: Leader Selection, Republicanism, Islamism, Ayatollah Khamenei, Religious Democracy.
Introduction
After the victory of the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979, a unique form of government based on "religious democracy" was established, which recognized the sovereignty of Islam and the people's sovereignty over their political and social destiny. The system of religious democracy is a unique and unprecedented model of governance, and one of the reasons for this distinction is the existence of the leadership position. Therefore, it is necessary to examine whether the system's performance has been in line with the indicators of religious democracy (Islamism and republicanism) in the selection of the leader.

Materials and Methods
The research question is: What indicators led to the selection of Ayatollah Khamenei as the leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran? The hypothesis is that the indicators of religious democracy (Islamism and republicanism) based on legitimacy in Shia political thought, the system of Imamate, and popular presence and acceptance, which are reflected in the constitution, govern the processes of selecting the leader.
The research method is qualitative with an analytical-descriptive approach. The reason for choosing this method is that it allows for the description of events related to the selection of the leader, while examining the realization of indicators related to the processes of republicanism and elements of Islamism in the thought of religious democracy, with the processes that have taken place for the selection of the leader and the characteristics of the selected individual.

Discussion & Result
The selection of Ayatollah Khamenei as the leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran is a significant event in the history of the country, and it is essential to examine the indicators of religious democracy (Islamism and republicanism) that led to his selection. This section will provide a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of the topic, building upon the existing content, and will discuss the various aspects of the selection process.

Indicators of Islamism
The indicators of Islamism in the selection of Ayatollah Khamenei as the leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran are numerous. Firstly, Imam Khomeini's approval and description of Ayatollah Khamenei as a Mujtahid. Imam Khomeini's endorsement of Ayatollah Khamenei is a testament to his expertise in Islamic sharia and his ability to lead the country in accordance with Islamic principles.
Secondly, Ayatollah Khamenei's jurisprudence and expertise in Islamic sharia are also indicators of Islamism. His extensive knowledge of Islamic sharia and his ability to interpret and apply it in a way that is consistent with the principles of the Islamic Republic are essential qualities for a leader of the country.
Thirdly, Ayatollah Khamenei's courage and insight in the face of challenges are also indicators of Islamism. His ability to navigate the complex political landscape of Iran and to make difficult decisions in the face of opposition and adversity is a testament to his strength and resilience as a leader.
Finally, Ayatollah Khamenei's management and leadership abilities are also indicators of Islamism. His ability to manage the country's affairs and to lead the government in a way that is consistent with Islamic principles is essential for the success of the Islamic Republic.

Indicators of Republicanism
The indicators of republicanism in the selection of Ayatollah Khamenei as the leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran are also numerous. Firstly, the formation of the Assembly of Experts for the selection of the leader is a significant indicator of republicanism. The Assembly of Experts is a democratic institution that is responsible for selecting the leader of the country, and its formation is a testament to the democratic nature of the Islamic Republic.
Secondly, the presentation of proposals by the members of the Assembly is also an indicator of republicanism. The members of the Assembly are elected by the people, and their proposals reflect the will of the people. The presentation of proposals by the members of the Assembly is a democratic process that allows for the participation of the people in the selection of the leader.
Thirdly, the selection of the leader based on the constitution is also an indicator of republicanism. The constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran outlines the qualifications and characteristics that a leader must possess, and the selection of Ayatollah Khamenei was based on these criteria. The selection of the leader based on the constitution is a democratic process that ensures that the leader is accountable to the people and is committed to upholding the principles of the Islamic Republic.
Finally, the widespread popular acceptance and allegiance to the leader are also indicators of republicanism. The people of Iran have consistently demonstrated their support for Ayatollah Khamenei, and his leadership has been widely accepted by the people. The widespread popular acceptance and allegiance to the leader are a testament to the democratic nature of the Islamic Republic and the legitimacy of Ayatollah Khamenei's leadership.

Conclusion
The paper concludes that the indicators of religious democracy (Islamism and republicanism) have been realized in the selection of Ayatollah Khamenei as the leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The selection of Ayatollah Khamenei was based on the approval and description of Imam Khomeini, his jurisprudence and expertise in Islamic law, his courage and insight in the face of challenges, and his management and leadership abilities. The formation of the Assembly of Experts, the presentation of proposals by the members, and the selection of the leader based on the constitution are also indicators of republicanism. The widespread popular acceptance and allegiance to the leader, as well as the review of the leader's qualifications and characteristics in accordance with the new constitution, are also indicators of the realization of religious democracy in the selection of the leader.
Keywords
Leader Selection
Republicanism
Islamism
Ayatollah Khamenei
Religious Democracy
Subjects
Quran.
Nahj al-Balagha.
Abazari, Abdolrahim and Mohammad Sadegh Mazinani (1400), “Khamenei, Seyyed Ali”, in: Encyclopedia of Imam Khomeini, vol. 5, Qom Seminary-Intellectualism.
Arai Nejad, Seyyed Saeed and Mehdi Narastani (1397), “A Look at the Leadership Model and Imam Khomeini's Leadership in Advancing the Islamic Revolution (A Case Study of Imam Khomeini's Leadership in Confronting the Approval of the Provincial and State Associations Bill)”, in: International Conference on Re-reading the Scientific and Cultural Works of the Islamic Revolution of Iran.
Arasta, Mohammad Javad (1377), “The Position of the Assembly of Experts from the Perspective of Selection Theory”, Islamic Government, no. 19, 62-83.
Ashraf al-Din Khan, Mohammad (1386), The System of Velayat-e Faqih and Religious Democracy, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, Al-Mustafa International University.
Ayatollah Khomeini, Seyyed Ruhollah (1367), Tahrir al-Wasilah, Mohammad Baqer Mousavi Hamadani (trans.), Qom: Dar al-Ilm.
Ayatollah Khomeini, Seyyed Ruhollah (1378), Sahifeh-e Imam Khomeini, Tehran: Institute for the Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works.
Behbudi, Hedayatollah (1391), Sharh-e Esm: The Biography of Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei (1357-1318), Tehran: Institute for Political Studies and Research.
Dabirnia, Alireza (1397), “Republicanism and Islamism in the Constitution of Iran; Dual or Unitary Sovereignty”, Comparative Law Research, vol. 22, no. 3, 83-104.
Dabirnia, Alireza and Azam Taleb Najafabadi (1402), “Mechanisms for Guaranteeing the Fundamental Rights of the Nation in the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran; The Link between Islamism and Republicanism”, Religion and Law, no. 41, 25-42.
Dashtizad, Saeed and Aniseh Haddad Mohammadabadi (1393), “The System of Religious Democracy and the Role of Public Opinion in Its Establishment, Consolidation, and Continuation”, in: International Congress on Religious Culture and Thought, Qom.
Ebrahimi, Seyyed Nasrallah (1385), “The Highest Government Position and Its Selection”, Islamic Government, no. 40, 143-187.
Ebrahimi, Mohammad Hossein (1379), Islamic Management, Qom: Bostan-e Ketab.
Eshaghi, Seyyed Hossein (1384), “Principles and Characteristics of Religious Democracy (1)”, Muballighan Journal, no. 69.
Eshaghi, Seyyed Hossein (1384), “Principles and Characteristics of Religious Democracy (2)”, Muballighan Journal, no. 70.
Hashemi Rafsanjani, Akbar (1390), The End of Defense, the Beginning of Reconstruction: The Record and Memoirs of 1367, Tehran: Ma'aref Publications.
Hashemi Nashlaji, Seyyed Ali (1400), “The Assembly of Experts for Leadership”, in: Encyclopedia of Imam Khomeini, vol. 9.
Hurr al-Amili, Mohammad ibn Hassan (1414 AH), Wasa'il al-Shi'a, Qom: Al al-Bayt.
Jabraili, Seyyed Yaser (1398), The Narrative of Leadership: The Relationship between Republicanism and Islamism in Determining the Supreme Leader, Tehran: Nasim-e Enqelab.
Javan Araste, Hossein (1385), “Republicanism and Islamism in the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran”, Islamic Government, no. 39, 96-117.
Jomhuri-e Eslami Newspaper, (1368/03/16), (1368/03/20).
Kayhan Newspaper (1361/05/10), (1368/03/21).
Lakzaei, Sharif (1381), “The Model of Political Participation in the Theories of Velayat-e Faqih”, Political Science, no. 20, 135-160.
Maktabi, Seyyed Mohammad and Parvin Sadat Qavami (1400), “The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran”, in: Encyclopedia of Imam Khomeini, vol. 8.
Mazinani, Mohammad Sadegh (1400), “The Assembly of Experts for the Constitution”, in: Encyclopedia of Imam Khomeini, vol. 9.
Mirzadeh Kuhsahi, Nader and Hassan Farsi (1389), “The Embodiment of Republicanism and Islamism in the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran”, Political Studies, no. 9, 129-152.
Momen Qomi, Mohammad (1397/12/07), “The Selection of the Deputy Leader from the Beginning Was Contrary to the Constitution”, Javan Newspaper, Retrieved from: <https://www.javanonline.ir/ 003yOL>.
Mortazaei, Seyyed Ahmad (1390), “Examination of the Conditions for the Guardian Council's Supervision over the Election of Experts”, Public Law Thoughts, no. 1, 171-196.
Proceedings of the Assembly of Experts: First Term, Third Session (Tir 1364) and Extraordinary Session (Aban 1364) (nd.), Secretariat of the Assembly of Experts, Qom: Islamic Publications Office.
Proceedings of the Assembly of Experts: First Term, Seventh Session (1376), Secretariat of the Assembly of Experts, Qom: Etemad.
Proceedings of the Final Review of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran (1364), Secretariat of the Assembly of Experts, Tehran: General Directorate of Cultural Affairs and Public Relations of the Islamic Consultative Assembly.
Rahbar, Abbas Ali and Mehrdad Moghaddami (1390), “The Legal Foundations of Religious Democracy in the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran”, Islamic Revolution Studies, no. 25, 183-208.
Tahhan Nazif, Hadi and Mohammad Javad Motiei (1399), “Analysis of the Definitions of the Guardian Council's Resolution on the Religious-Political Figure, Manager, and Administrator”, Public Law Knowledge, vol. 9, no. 27, 49-68.
Tamimi Amadi, Abd al-Wahid (1366), Ghurar al-Hikam wa Durar al-Kalim. Commentary by Aqa Jamal al-Din Khansari, Qom: Islamic Propagation Office.
The History of the Islamic Revolution: Ayatollah Montazeri from Deputy Leadership to Dismissal (1393), Cultural Institute of Qadr-e Velayat, Tehran: Qadr-e Velayat.
 
Contemporary Political Studies
Volume 15, Issue 4
Winter 2024
Autumn 2024
Pages 55-87