نقش جامعه‌پذیری سیاسی و کارگزاران آن در میزان وفاداری سیاسی شهروندان، مطالعه موردی: شهر اصفهان

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه اردکان، شهر اردکان، ایران

2 استادیار گروه معارف، دانشگاه پیام نور، ایران.

چکیده

هدف اصلی این مقاله نقش جامعه‌پذیری سیاسی و کارگزاران آن در میزان وفاداری سیاسی شهروندان است که با روش پیمایشی و استفاده از ابزار پرسشنامه انجام گرفت. جامعه آماری پژوهش، شهروندان بالای 18 سال شهر اصفهان به تعداد 2243249 نفر در سال 95 می‌باشد. حجم نمونه با فرمول کوکران 384 نفر به دست آمد که با روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای انتخاب شدند. برای پردازش داده‌ها، از نرم‌افزار SPSS استفاده گردید. نتایج حاصل از تحلیل داده‌ها نشان می‌دهد که بین جامعه‌پذیری سیاسی و کارگزاران آن با میزان وفاداری سیاسی شهروندان رابطه معنادار وجود دارد. بر اساس یافته‌های به دست آمده، بین نقش خانواده (42/0r= )، نظام آموزشی (33/0r= )، همسالان (37/0r= )، رسانه‌های جمعی (42/0r= )، احزاب سیاسی (30/0r= ) و دینداری (80/0r= ) با میزان وفاداری سیاسی شهروندان رابطه‌ی معناداری وجود دارد. نتایج ضریب رگرسیونی نشان می‌دهد که متغیرهای دینداری (514/0=Beta)، اثربخشی سیاسی (265/0=Beta)، وقایع سیاسی (297/0=Beta)، احزاب سیاسی (199/0- =Beta)، آگاهی سیاسی (069/0=Beta) و نظام آموزشی (060/0- =Beta) وارد معادله شده و در مجموع 774/0 از واریانس متغیر وابسته را تبیین کرده‌اند (774/0=R²). می‌توان استدلال کرد که این متغیرها در میزان وفاداری سیاسی افراد نقش بسیار مهمی ایفا می‌کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The role of political socialization and its agents in the political loyalty of citizens Case study: Isfahan city

نویسندگان [English]

  • Nejat Mohammadifar 1
  • Mohsen Nasr Esfahani 2
1 Department of Political Science, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Ardakan University, Ardakan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Education, Payame Noor University,, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The main purpose of this article is the role of political socialization and its agents in the amount of political loyalty of citizens, which was done by survey method and using questionnaire tools. The statistical population of the study is citizens over the age of 18 in Isfahan with 2243249 people in 2016. The sample size was 384 with the Cochran's formula, which was selected by stratified random sampling. SPSS software was used to process the data. The results of the data analysis show that there is a significant relationship between political socialization and its agents and the amount of political loyalty of citizens. Based on the findings, between the role of family (r = 0.42), educational system (r = 0.33), peers (r = 0.37), mass media (r = 0.42), political parties (r = 0.30) and religiosity (r = 0.80) has a significant relationship with the level of political loyalty of citizens. The results of regression coefficient show that the variables of religiosity (Beta = 0.514), political effectiveness (Beta = 0.265), political events (Beta = 0.297), political parties (Beta= -0.199), political awareness (Beta = 0.069) and the educational system (Beta = -0.060) entered the equation and explained a total of 0.774 of the dependent variable variance (R² = 0.774). It can be argued that these variables play a very important role in the degree of political loyalty of individuals.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Political Loyalty
  • Political socialization
  • Family
  • Mass Media
  • Religion
  • Political Parties
بینگهام، جی و گابریل آلموند. (1375). جامعه‌پذیری سیاسی و فرهنگ سیاسی، ترجمه‌ی علیرضا طیب، اطلاعات سیاسی اقتصادی، 113-114: 31-22.
خواجه سروی، غلامرضا. (1394). عوامل مؤثر بر جامعه‌پذیری سیاسی دانشجویان دانشگاه‌های دولتی ایران، فصلنامه جستارهای سیاسی معاصر، 6(4): 55-31.
راش، مایکل. (1395). جامعه و سیاست: مقدمه‌ای بر جامعه‌شناسی سیاسی، ترجمه منوچهر صبوری، تهران: سمت.
طالاری، محمد. موسوی شفائی، مسعود. (1395). جامعه‌پذیری سیاسی بستری برای بازاریابی سیاسی رابطه مند، فصلنامه راهبرد، 25(79): 225-199.
عالم، عبدالرحمن. (1395). بنیادهای علم سیاست، تهران: نی
کشیشیان سیرکی، گارینه. (1396). فرهنگ و جامعه پذیری سیاسی در عصر اطلاعات، فصلنامه مطالعات میان رشته ای در رسانه و فرهنگ، ۲ (۱۴) 173-203.
نایبی، حسین. (1398). تأثیر بازاریابی سیاسی در رسانه‌های اجتماعی بر میزان وفاداری رأی‌دهندگان بر مبنای مدل فیل هریس (مورد مطالعه: انتخابات مجلس شورای اسلامی در شهرستان مشهد)، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ‌واحد شاهرود.
نیکزاد، محمدحسین. (1393). تحلیلی بر وضعیت جامعه‌پذیری سیاسی دانشجویان: مطالعه‌ی موردی دانشجویان دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی تهران، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
 
Alwin, D. F., & Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Aging, cohorts, and the stability of sociopolitical orientations over the life span. American journal of sociology, 97(1), 169-195.
Barbera, P. (2015). Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data. Political analysis, 23(1), 76-91.
Beck, A. (1977). The Role of agents in political socialization . New York: The free press.
Beck, P. A. (1977). The role of agents in political socialization. Handbook of political socialization, 115-141.
Beck, P. A., & Jennings, M. K. (1982). Pathways to participation. American Political Science Review, 76(1), 94-108.
Blessing, W. K. (1978). The Cult of Monarchy, Political Loyalty and the Workers' Movement in Imperial Germany. Journal of Contemporary History, 13(2), 357-375.
Callander, S., & Wilson, C. H. (2007). Turnout, polarization, and Duverger's law. The Journal of Politics69(4), 1047-1056.
Campbell, D. (2004). Deterritorialized loyalty: Multiculturalism and Bosnia. In Linklater, A., & Waller, M. (Eds.). Political Loyalty and the Nation-state (43-58). Routledge.
Campbell, D. E. (2009). Civic engagement and education: An empirical test of the sorting model. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 771-786.
Cochran, M. M., & Brassard, J. A. (1979). Child development and personal social networks. Child development, 50 (3): 601–616.
Dabula, N. (2016). The influence of social media political marketing on trust, loyalty and voting intention of youth voters in South Africa (Doctoral dissertation).
Delanty, G. (2004). Loyalty and the European Union. In Linklater, A., & Waller, M. (Eds.). Political Loyalty and the Nation-state (123-136). Routledge.
Denny, K., & Doyle, O. (2008). Political interest, cognitive ability and personality: Determinants of voter turnout in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 291-310.
Devetak, R. (2003). Loyalty and plurality. Political Loyalty and the Nation-state. Abingdon: Routledge27.
Devetak, R. (2004). Loyalty and plurality: Images of the nation in Australia. In Linklater, A., & Waller, M. (Eds.). Political Loyalty and the Nation-state (27-42). Routledge.
Dinas, E. (2013). Opening “Openness to Change” Political Events and the Increased Sensitivity of Young Adults. Political Research Quarterly, 66(4), 868-882.
Dowell, A. M. (2008). The Case for Political Loyalty. IU South Bend Undergraduate Research Journal, 8, 49-54.
Durkheim, E. (1964). The division of labor in society. Simon and Schuster.
Easton, D., & Dennis, J. (1969). Children in the political system: Origins of political legitimacy (p. 7). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Erikson, R. S., & Stoker, L. (2011). Caught in the draft: The effects of Vietnam draft lottery status on political attitudes. American Political Science Review105(2), 221-237.
Felten, E. (2011). Loyalty: The vexing virtue. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Finlay, A., Wray-Lake, L., & Flanagan, C. (2010). Civic engagement during the transition to adulthood: Developmental opportunities and social policies at a critical juncture. Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth, 277-305.
Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2005). Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.
Franklin, C. H., & Jackson, J. E. (1983). The dynamics of party identification. American political science review, 77(4), 957-973.
Franklin, M. N. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. Cambridge University Press.
Gassah, L.S. (1992). Regional Political Parties in North East India . Osmon public India.
Gert, B. (2013). Loyalty and morality. Nomos, 54, 3-21.
Greenstein, F. I. (1969). Children and politics (p. 185). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hampton, J. (1997). Political Philosophy. Boulder.
Hyman, H. (1959). Political socialization: A Study in the Psychology of Political Behavior. New York: Free Press.
Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R. G. (2014). Generations and politics: A panel study of young adults and their parents. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jennings, M. K., Stoker, L., & Bowers, J. (2009). Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 782-799.
Jenson, C. (1972). Loyalty as a Political Weapon: The 1918 Campaign in Minnesota. Minnesota History43(2), 42-57.
Johneston, M. (2005). Political Parties in Theoritical and Democratic prespective. Washington: Washinton Press.
Kandel, D. B., & Andrews, K. (1987). Processes of adolescent socialization by parents and peers. International Journal of the Addictions, 22(4), 319-342.
Ladd, J. (1972). Loyalty. In P. Edwards (Ed.), The encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol. 5, pp. 97–98). London, UK: Collier Macmillan.
Langton, K. P. (1967). Peer group and school and the political socialization process. American Political Science Review, 61(3), 751-758.
Langton, K. P., & Jennings, M. K. (1968). Political socialization and the high school civics curriculum in the United States. American political science review, 62(3), 852-867.
Lodge, M. (2010). Public service bargains in British central government: Multiplication, diversification and reassertion? In M. Painter & B. G. Peters (Eds.), Tradition and public administration (pp. 99–113). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
MacKuen, M. B., Erikson, R. S., & Stimson, J. A. (1989). Macropartisanship. American Political Science Review, 83(4), 1125-1142.
Malmendier, U., & Nagel, S. (2011). Depression babies: do macroeconomic experiences affect risk taking?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1), 373-416.
Marshall, G. (1998). Political Socialization, in A Dictionary of Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Muirhead, R. (2013). The case for party loyalty. In S. Levinson, J. Parker, & P. Woodruff (Eds.), Loyalty (pp.229–256). New York, NY: New York University Press. doi:10.2307/24220179.
Neundorf, A., & Smets, K. (2020). Political socialisation and the making of citizens. In: Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199935307 (doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935307.013.98).
Neundorf, A., Niemi, R. G., & Smets, K. (2016). The compensation effect of civic education on political engagement: How civics classes make up for missing parental socialization. Political Behavior, 38(4), 921-949.
Nie, N. H., Junn, J., & Stehlik-Barry, K. (1996). Education and democratic citizenship in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Niemi, R. G., & Hepburn, M. A. (1995). The rebirth of political socialization. Perspectives on Political Science, 24(1), 7-16.
Niemi, R. G., & Junn, J. (2005). Civic education: What makes students learn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Page, B. I., & Jones, C. C. (1979). Reciprocal effects of policy preferences, party loyalties and the vote. American Political Science Review, 73(4), 1071-1089.
Peisakhin, L., & Pinto, P. (2009). Army as the forge of political loyalty: the case of Chinese PoWs in the Korean War. Yale University manuscript.
Popova, O., & Riabushko, A. (2017). Political loyalty of the Russian youth in the context of economic crisis. In Proceedings of the Internationsl Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia (pp. 85-90).
Royce, J. (1924). The philosophy of loyalty. New York, NY: Hafner.
Rutgers, M. R., & Yang, L. (2019). Virtue or Vice: The Nature of Loyalty. Public Integrity, 21(4), 394-405.
Sapiro, V. (2004). Not Your Parents’ Political Socialization: Introduction for a New Generation. Annual Review of Political Science., 7: 1-23.
Schuman, H., & Corning, A. (2012). Generational memory and the critical period: Evidence for national and world events. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(1), 1-31.
Searing, D. D., Schwartz, J. J., & Lind, A. E. (1973). The structuring principle: Political socialization and belief systems. American Political Science Review67(2), 415-432.
Searing, D., Wright, G., & Rabinowitz, G. (1976). The primacy principle: Attitude change and political socialization. British Journal of Political Science6(1), 83-113.
Shklar, J. (1993). Obligation, loyalty, exile. Political Theory, 21(2), 181–197.
Smets, K., & Neundorf, A. (2014). The hierarchies of age-period-cohort research: Political context and the development of generational turnout patterns. Electoral Studies33, 41-51.
Steans, J. (2004). Conflicting loyalties:Women’s human rights and the politics of identity. In Linklater, A., & Waller, M. (Eds.). Political Loyalty and the Nation-state (59-72). Routledge.
Stuvland, A. (2020).The Politics of Religious ‘Nones’: Exploring the Relationship between Religious Affiliation and Political Loyalty. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339727299
Tedin, K. L. (1980). Assessing peer and parent influence on adolescent political attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 24 (1): 136–154.
Torney-Purta, J. (2002). The school's role in developing civic engagement: A study of adolescents in twenty-eight countries. Applied developmental science6(4), 203-212.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K., & Burns, N. (2005). Family ties: Understanding the intergenerational transmission of participation. In The Social Logic of Politics, Alan Zuckerman. 95–114. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.