نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
This article examines some fundamental perspectives in the political thought of Abū Ḥāmid Ghazālī and Muḥammad Bāqir Sabzavārī and compares their views on specific topics. This research explores the differences between their approaches after analyzing their political opinions on several broad themes and comparing them. By identifying these differences, we can draw meaningful conclusions. After analyzing Ghazālī’s perspective on five different topics, we demonstrate in each section that Sabzavārī, who authored his work several centuries after Ghazālī, presents more balanced, pragmatic, and adaptable viewpoints on these subjects. This suggests that centuries of political and historical struggles and events influenced the political perspectives of certain prominent thinkers. Furthermore, if adopting more moderate and pragmatic approaches is considered a sign of civilizational progress in political science, then the changes observed in Sabzavārī’s political thought indicate an advancement and evolution in political opinions within our civilizational sphere, compared to earlier political ideas.
کلیدواژهها English
